| Pages: [1] |
1. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This emphasis on trollceptors is indicative of the real problem. The reason why people keep talking about trollceptors is because nobody is serious about actually taking space. No one wants to take sov except as a joke. CCP might be making it eas...
- by Dras Malar - at 2015.03.15 20:04:53
|
2. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
As it stands none of us has any idea whether interceptors will be a problem in the big picture or not, because none of us has tried it. This system is going to demand a different defensive dynamic in nullsec, which is why everyone is worked up ove...
- by Dras Malar - at 2015.03.14 13:13:38
|
3. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I'd like to rephrase my argument. I would like to do away with the sovlaser and instead keep structures, but simplify a lot of the unnecessary convoluted timers and all the things you need a flowchart to understand in Dominion. Bash a thing, get a...
- by Dras Malar - at 2015.03.13 11:09:00
|
4. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
These calculations about isk expenditures on both sides are assuming that the attacker is trying to win the isk war and isn't just trying to annoy you to death. Even if it costs more in interceptors than your ihub is worth it could still be worth ...
- by Dras Malar - at 2015.03.11 00:22:27
|
5. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Daimus Daranius wrote: The amount of goon tears in this thread is causing a flood of biblical proportions, and their reactions are silly even when people like God's Apples are giving them exact fits that are perfect counter to trollceptors. If...
- by Dras Malar - at 2015.03.10 14:00:59
|
6. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Daimus Daranius wrote: Dave Stark wrote: Promiscuous Female wrote: Daimus Daranius wrote: even when people like God's Apples are giving them exact fits that are perfect counter to trollceptors. his idea was garbage fyi and would not...
- by Dras Malar - at 2015.03.10 13:47:09
|
7. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This update does the opposite of what nullsec needs. Having an arbitrarily defined alliance-wide primetime does not incentivize diversity. The real problem is that there's no longer any risk-reward calculation in this system. By turning sov into...
- by Dras Malar - at 2015.03.10 06:18:38
|
8. Sticky:[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I really do not understand the point of the Entosis module. Why should sov be decided by a new gimmicky high slot module? If you want effective military control to decide sov battles, why not just leave it up to structure hitpoints and remove all ...
- by Dras Malar - at 2015.03.09 23:35:29
|
9. Sticky:Pre-CSM Summit Nullsec and Sov Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The meta is not 200+ Archons. Name the last time 200 Archons were in a fight. All this talk of pasta straining makes it sound like we can't defend our space at all. How come we still have it then? The CFC likes fights as well. The only differenc...
- by Dras Malar - at 2014.10.06 18:15:00
|
10. Sticky:Pre-CSM Summit Nullsec and Sov Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Deck Cadelanne wrote: I can use a phone or IM and get my mates to log in. What I don't expect is to then be able to bridge or jump them, without any risk or further effort, clear across the galaxy to blob somebody. Again, bridging and jumpi...
- by Dras Malar - at 2014.10.06 17:38:00
|
11. Sticky:Pre-CSM Summit Nullsec and Sov Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Rahelis wrote: Dras, your tears only show how bad an effect it is to become a risk averse null bear like you are. Every FW noob in a frig has to think of more factors that you noobs do. That is why your kind gets butcherd every time you come ...
- by Dras Malar - at 2014.10.06 17:32:00
|
12. Sticky:Pre-CSM Summit Nullsec and Sov Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Deck Cadelanne wrote: Monasucks wrote: aside from all the other changes: We play eve in our free time. Now we should wait and spend our free time having less fun and just idle for some kind of cool down or by boring travelling by gates? C...
- by Dras Malar - at 2014.10.05 21:44:00
|
13. Sticky:Pre-CSM Summit Nullsec and Sov Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
The end result is that whoever owns capital ships, especially the exceedingly high-EHP supers, and is alert and can coordinate a significant defense force will absolutely dominate sovereignty fights. Those of us who have carriers can drop them in ...
- by Dras Malar - at 2014.10.05 10:50:00
|
14. Sticky:Pre-CSM Summit Nullsec and Sov Thread - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
What a lot of people don't seem to understand is that the nullsec leaders may be interested in finding ways to win, but it's not because they don't respect the concept of fairness. As players they want to win, and as leaders of large groups of pla...
- by Dras Malar - at 2014.10.05 10:49:00
|
| Pages: [1] |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |